XP is just a number | |
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Provocative *yawn* it all repeats for anyone motivated to try and fix them? Remember, fix doesn't mean gut, fix doesn't mean radical api changes, closing bug reports isn't fixing bugs, supplying patches (forking) doesn't mean you get to apply them, ... any idea prioritized TODO ..I know there is a the CPAN River Do the same thing? Use the open apis? Pick randomly from list or plain cpan? See maybe https://blog.urth.org/2017/12/25/swimming-in-the-river-of-cpan/ or http://neilb.org/2016/01/26/river-head-quality.html One random item from cpan-river-3000.perl-5.31.master.psv that you could stumble upon while searching cpan https://metacpan.org/pod/sanity Oct 01, 2014 Distribution: sanity River stage two * 11 direct dependents * 24 total dependentts Module version: 1.03 Testers (2549 / 8 / 16) Kwalitee 52.82% Coverage http://cpancover.com/latest/sanity-1.03/index.html https://cpants.cpanauthors.org/release/BBYRD/sanity-1.03 3 open https://github.com/SineSwiper/sanity/issues 5 year old distributions in various river stages https://metacpan.org/author/BBYRD
In reply to Re: Prioritizing Broken CPAN Modules (*yawn*)
by Anonymous Monk
|
|