good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
comment on |
( [id://3333]=superdoc: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Sounds like a positive thing to me. Thank you for taking the initiative. Bulk-convert the extant CatQ's. Will there be some way to remove the blessings? I only ask because I think there may be some answers in the CatQs which were probably best practice 20 years ago but less so now. The same will probably be true in 20 years of some "good" answers today. If there is a blessing-removal facility then the bulk conversion is fine but maybe going through and converting one-by-one isn't such a bad idea for quality's sake? If QandAEditors is most in need of more willing volunteers, then I'll put my hand up. In reply to Re: RFC: Better Best Answers Gets Real
by hippo
|
|