I wonder if it's not best to ignore any statements about it supposedly being in decline (or what it's not suitable for or line noise yada yada yada), or at least not to repeat or link to them in places that casual users (like me) go to learn more about Perl. I recall once tuning into comp.lang.tcl, which is quite a nice group, though I never actually ended up using tcl (yet). What struck me, and a lot of what I remember now, was how often a subject along the lines of, "the outer world doesn't realize that tcl/tk is still alive and well," or "the outer world doesn't appreciate how much progess we've made" would recur. I had no picture of the tcl community before but now my picture was that they're riding some kind of lifeboat or whatever. Similar story when I check out comp.lang.lisp. I guess people feel a need to respond to cheap ideas in the wider world, maybe in some cathartic way, but the effect for me was to act as a repeater perpetuating the very ideas they fell in conflict with (and with this post it makes another hop -- doh!).
I liked the rest of your piece, though.
-
Are you posting in the right place? Check out Where do I post X? to know for sure.
-
Posts may use any of the Perl Monks Approved HTML tags. Currently these include the following:
<code> <a> <b> <big>
<blockquote> <br /> <dd>
<dl> <dt> <em> <font>
<h1> <h2> <h3> <h4>
<h5> <h6> <hr /> <i>
<li> <nbsp> <ol> <p>
<small> <strike> <strong>
<sub> <sup> <table>
<td> <th> <tr> <tt>
<u> <ul>
-
Snippets of code should be wrapped in
<code> tags not
<pre> tags. In fact, <pre>
tags should generally be avoided. If they must
be used, extreme care should be
taken to ensure that their contents do not
have long lines (<70 chars), in order to prevent
horizontal scrolling (and possible janitor
intervention).
-
Want more info? How to link
or How to display code and escape characters
are good places to start.
|