Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Welcome to the Monastery
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Listing # comments versus # replies

by PodMaster (Abbot)
on Feb 29, 2004 at 16:52 UTC ( [id://332656]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Listing # comments versus # replies
in thread Listing # comments versus # replies

Nope. If you can, see for yourself => newlistapproved ( the sql looks like "select count...").

update: It appears there is some support for this already, but the user setting is missing? I'll investigate.
update: And patch submitted (The dangerous Signature Settings had it, but User Settings didn't).

MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).
** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Listing # comments versus # replies

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Listing # comments versus # replies
by flyingmoose (Priest) on Feb 29, 2004 at 17:21 UTC
    Cool deal. As to the grandparent post, I considered that possibility , but I figured the PerlMonks gods were smarter than that given the relatively decent speed at which pages load today... :)

    FYI -- I don't think we have permision to see the nodes you linked, so we will just pretend they had cool stuff on them :)

      Actually its not so cool. You aren't missing much. :-)


      ---
      demerphq

        First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
        -- Gandhi


Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://332656]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others admiring the Monastery: (5)
As of 2024-04-24 06:33 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found