Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
more useful options
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Site HTML filtering, Phase II

by theorbtwo (Prior)
on Feb 12, 2004 at 13:32 UTC ( #328551=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Site HTML filtering, Phase II
in thread Site HTML filtering, Phase II

OK, perhaps I'm overstating it a bit. It's not that much harder then &lsb;, &lbracket;, &ob;, or whatever, would be, and has the advantage of being a real HTML entity, and not something we just made up.

It took me a long time to be able to remember it too.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Site HTML filtering, Phase II
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Feb 12, 2004 at 14:15 UTC
    Some googling seems to indicate that [ and ] are the SGML entity names.

    Abigail

      Some googling seems to indicate that [ and ] are the SGML entity names.

      Some testing seems to indicate that Gecko doesn't support these, which probably means nothing else does either. Maybe I'll just put #91 in my sig...


      $;=sub{$/};@;=map{my($a,$b)=($_,$;);$;=sub{$a.$b->()}} split//,".rekcah lreP rehtona tsuJ";$\=$ ;->();print$/
        Well, it's not an HTML entity name, so I'm not surprised. That however doesn't mean Perlmonks can't support it. After all, I doubt that Gecko, or anything else, supports <readmore>. I thought Perlmonks support was the issue at hand in the post I was replying to.

        Abigail

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://328551]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (5)
As of 2021-02-25 20:14 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?