Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Boycott O'Reilly

by bradcathey (Prior)
on Jan 22, 2004 at 15:59 UTC ( [id://323221]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Boycott O'Reilly
in thread Boycott O'Reilly

Okay, okay Abigail-II and hardburn. My bad-- I also normally cringe when people trot out the 1st admendment. Just like when I hear the words," separation of church and state" which is not in the Constitution, period. So your points are well-taken, my points: O'Reilly can do what they want and when you have that large of a body of work, leave 'em alone.

Big question: I wonder if the W3 is gonna support the new tag <peeve.... Abigail-II continues to amaze...she closed the tag.

—Brad
"A little yeast leavens the whole dough."

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Boycott O'Reilly
by jryan (Vicar) on Jan 23, 2004 at 04:01 UTC
    Just like when I hear the words," separation of church and state" which is not in the Constitution, period.

    What exactly do you think "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" means?

Re: Re: Re: Boycott O'Reilly
by Anonymous Monk on Jan 23, 2004 at 06:13 UTC
    Yes, there is nothing that reads "seperation of church and state." The word "privacy" is also missing from the Constitution, but if you actually read the Constitution a right to privacy and a seperation of Church and State can be interpreted.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://323221]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others musing on the Monastery: (2)
As of 2024-04-25 22:42 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found