![]() |
|
good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: No Anonymous Reply Optionby boo_radley (Parson) |
on Nov 24, 2003 at 13:39 UTC ( #309524=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
...it's being rumoured that tilly posted as an anonymous monk, and perhaps tilly has claimed that himself as well. But how would we know which AM postings are tilly's?Why would knowing which AM posts were tilly's matter? Having read your thoughts in this thread, I really don't understand why you'd block them, Abigail-II. Aside from your observation -- an incorrect one -- that They don't contribute much, I can't see where you're coming from.
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|