Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Arguments needed for comparision between Perl, ASP and Java

by Anonymous Monk
on Nov 11, 2003 at 08:37 UTC ( #306123=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Arguments needed for comparision between Perl, ASP and Java
in thread Arguments needed for comparision between Perl, ASP and Java

A) I don't think you can call any language 'object oriented'. OO is a design style, not a function of the language. You can write OO code in C and write procedural code in java. Granted in general it's much easier to write OO in java and procedural in C, but it doesn't make C a 'procedural language' or java an OO language.

A) Oh, I think you can. An OO language is one that supports object oriented semantics at the language level. Java does, C does not. I will agree that one can program in either an OO or procedural style in either language, but that doesn't make Java more procedural nor C more OO.

C) I also agree that Java's meaningful differences from Perl have nothing to do with OO. But 'static' vs 'dynamic', comes to mind.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Arguments needed for comparision between Perl, ASP and Java

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://306123]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2021-10-19 06:47 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    My first memorable Perl project was:







    Results (76 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?