Is it a surprise that the argument is wrong?
I spent a few years on alt.atheism and friends, and without
exception every last argument I saw against evolution
showed some basic misunderstanding of biology, general
science, math, or a combination of the above.
I used to have a great essay, A Priori vs A
Posteriori (or something like that) on alt.atheism
I pointed people at for most
of the statistical arguments. I used the copy on
dejanews, but they are
fubarred at the moment. If anyone can find it I would
appreciate it.
And yes, this is seriously OT for this site. Anyone with
an interest in this should go to talk.origins and hash it
out there. Or visit their
website and learn some of the basics.
EDIT
A friend of mine just found it for me. Here is
a copy. :-)
Basically after a lot of math, the point is that the
argument by design will only be convincing to people who
already have some belief in God... |