|
|
|
| Think about Loose Coupling | |
| PerlMonks |
Re: Isn't COBOL 4GL?by atcroft (Abbot) |
| on Oct 21, 2003 at 19:54 UTC ( [id://301044]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
Actually, according to their definitions, COBOL would be considered a third-generation language (as would be ForTran and BASIC, which were developed around the same time, if memory serves, as well as C/C++ and Java).
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||