|Syntactic Confectionery Delight|
Re: Editors editing considerations?by gmax (Abbot)
|on Oct 13, 2003 at 18:54 UTC||Need Help??|
I agree on the need of this improvement.
If such a feature is to be implemented, though, perhaps it should take into account other needs as well, such as the case of a node considered for the wrong reason.
In all these cases, editing the consideration field would not solve the problem.
What should address all these issues, while keeping the spirit of the Monastery, would be the capability of adding a comment to the initial consideration comment.
If this feature is implemented, the consideration input box doesn't disappear after submission, and other monks can add their own comments to address the problem correctly.
A stream of comments for case (1) would be:
for case (2):
for case (3):
for case (4):
I believe that such a change would improve the quality of the whole consideration process.
_ _ _ _ (_|| | |(_|>< _|