Re: Re: What's Your Mental Image of XSLT?

Some interesting responses there, for which I thank you.

I'm not sure I quite understand yours, pg. It's the kind of abstract stuff that makes my head hurt.

Does anyone have a mental mapping that they use with Perl/SQL code, (he said, widening the discussion a little)?

Do you for instance think of


<xsl:apply-templates select="item">
[download]


SELECT * FROM xml_document WHERE element_name = 'item'
[download]

and

<xsl:template match="item">
<p>
    <xsl:value-of select="." />
</p>
</xsl:template>
[download]

while(fetchrow-hashref){
  print '<p>' . $value . '<p>';
}
[download]

that kind of thing?

($_='kkvvttuubbooppuuiiffssqqffssmmiibbddllffss')
 =~y~b-v~a-z~s;                             print
[download]

Comment on Re: Re: What's Your Mental Image of XSLT? Select or Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: What's Your Mental Image of XSLT?
by pg (Canon) on Oct 11, 2003 at 05:34 UTC

Interesting... you know what, I actually had the same thought to compare XML with database and XSLT with SQL...

Actually there was (is) a XML query language defined, although I don't think it gained any serious attention.

More than SQL, which is just a set of command to manipulate the data in storage, XSLT is actully more similar to PL/SQL in terms of role.

To be quite frank, comparing with database, i am not in favor of XML at all, and have the feeling that XML will go away after a while (of course everything goes away eventually, but XML is not a very big success, in terms of technology).

Although XML is something new, but I can see lots of stuffs in it simply goes backwards.

Performance and bandwidth are two biggest problems with XML, and I strongly believe they are XML built-in. (Well one can always call something XML, even after it being foundamentaly modified *enhanced*, but to me that does not count)

What's your thought?

[reply]


Your skill will accomplish what the force of many cannot
	PerlMonks