Re: Re: Perl IDE


XP is just a number
	PerlMonks

Re: Re: Perl IDE

by BrowserUk (Patriarch)

on Sep 21, 2003 at 14:00 UTC ( [id://292985]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to Re: Perl IDE
in thread Perl IDE

Isn't that an obfuscated way of writing a do block? :)

P:\test>perl -m-warnings=syntax -MO=Deparse,-p
    if (COND) {
        print ("something")
    }
^Z
no warnings;
do {
    print('something')
};
- syntax OK
[download]

Examine what is said, not who speaks.

"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller
If I understand your problem, I can solve it! Of course, the same can be said for you.

Comment on Re: Re: Perl IDE Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: Perl IDE
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Sep 21, 2003 at 15:53 UTC

The way Abigail-II wrote the example is a bit misleading I think... He means this warning I believe:

D:\>perl -we "print('foo')"
foo
D:\>perl -we "print ('foo')"
print (...) interpreted as function at -e line 1.
foo
D:\>perl -we "print  ('foo')"
foo
D:\>perl -we "no warnings qw/syntax/; print ('foo')"
foo
D:\>
[download]

_{<Elian> And I do take a kind of perverse pleasure in having an OO assembly language...}

[reply]
[d/l]
[select]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom