Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
There's more than one way to do things
 
PerlMonks  

Re^3: Separation of SQL code

by adrianh (Chancellor)
on Sep 12, 2003 at 21:56 UTC ( [id://291198]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Separation of SQL code
in thread (z) Separation of SQL code

The idea is to abstract the business logic off to the stored procedures, so you'll be unlikely to be doing just a simple select.

Indeed, keeping everything the side of the database more often speeds things up in my experience. You're not moving data over the wire so all processing is happening locally. For example, doing anything involving iterating over a set of rows is likely to be a lot faster if you keep everything on the database side. It's also common to have more CPU cycles to play with on the database server too.

So I guess my experience is the opposite of yours :-)

This isn't to say I always think stored procedures are a good idea.

They are highly database dependant for example. If you're dealing with multiple databases, or if its possible you'll want to switch platforms, stored procedures are probably a bad idea.

Also, if you're only developing a single application then many of the safety advantages in isolating the business logic in the database disappear. An API in one language is just as good as an API in another. In this case it can make sense to keep everything in a single language so you don't have to find a PL/SQL (or whatever) coder for the team.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://291198]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others imbibing at the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-20 01:55 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found