The only reason I can see to consider that node is to amend the title to include "(parental advisory)" or something to that affect (kinda like we might do for spoilers).
Offensive is not a magic word.
Just because you consider this poetry to be crap/dumb/childish is no reason to reap it.
The node clearly matches the criteria for perl poetry,
and as such should definetly not be reaped.
Why is this appropriate for Perl Monks today (so far 3 votes to keep), when it wasn't the last time it was posted (5 votes for deletion, 0 for keep)?
Opportunity.
Content is moderated by those who are here to moderate it ->
NodeReaper loose in the monastery ->
and there aren't really any moderation
guidelines (it's a work in progress).
PS -- a funny thing happened when I was quoting you, I started writing </blockhead> ;D
I'd like to thank castaway for the link.
MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!" |
I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README). |
** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy. |