Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
P is for Practical
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Weird "soundex" algorithm

by broquaint (Abbot)
on Aug 28, 2003 at 23:58 UTC ( #287556=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Weird "soundex" algorithm
in thread Weird "soundex" algorithm

You use a looping match for offsets into $_ but really ...
Er, what looping? The /g matches the first vowel then saves the position of the match for substr which the replace then operates on. I didn't want to use the $+ variable because of the overhead it invokes.
HTH

_________
broquaint

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Weird "soundex" algorithm
by diotalevi (Canon) on Aug 29, 2003 at 01:53 UTC

    Er... what overhead? You mean of making an array access because that's all it is. @+ and @- don't invoke the $`, $& and $' penalties. Those arrays are just offsets into the string. $-[0] is the offset of the beginning of the string and $+[0] is the offset of the end of the string. Using those doesn't prompt perl to do all the copying that capturing, $`, $&, and $' do. Its just not the same thing.

    Granted, I did miss that scalar /g loops only once and in this usage that'd be the only loop ever used. I find myself avoiding pos() after learning that it doesn't survive a local() on the variable in question. That's just style though.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://287556]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (6)
As of 2020-11-24 05:53 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found

    Notices?