Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid
 
PerlMonks  

Re: On the involuntary encapsulation violation

by PodMaster (Abbot)
on Aug 26, 2003 at 16:29 UTC ( [id://286774]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to On the involuntary encapsulation violation

I find this to be a matter of documentation. There are no standards. You can do anything you want, all willy-nilly and whatnot. Whenever I see data being passed by reference to a module(method/function), I assume it's fair game for that data to be modified, unless the docs explicitly state that's not gonna happen. If the docs say it's not gonna happen, and it does, then it is clearly a bug (otherwise it's fair game, like i already said).

MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).
** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

  • Comment on Re: On the involuntary encapsulation violation

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://286774]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others meditating upon the Monastery: (7)
As of 2024-04-25 08:00 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found