Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
No such thing as a small change
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Googlish approach to voting/XP?

by Abigail-II (Bishop)
on Aug 07, 2003 at 13:54 UTC ( [id://281892]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Googlish approach to voting/XP?
in thread Googlish approach to voting/XP?

Too artificial, and there's still an initiative to vote. Perhaps if casting a vote would cost you something. Money, XP, a pound of flesh, or something. Then only posts you really care about you would vote on.

Abigail

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Googlish approach to voting/XP?
by Anonymous Monk on Aug 09, 2003 at 21:38 UTC

    I'd wager virtually nobody would vote. The only exception being if the benefits of receiving a vote outweighed the costs of casting it, in which case small groups would agree to upvote eachother's posts. You'd also have more problems with multiple account sign-ups just to upvote nodes.

    If you want to make vote's more valuable, simply decrease the supply, then most people would use them more carefully.

    Or you could just get rid of the whole silly system. Or make XP private. Or forget about the whole thing ;-)

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://281892]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others browsing the Monastery: (8)
As of 2024-04-16 07:29 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found