Re: Bug in the saint's board

Another possible tie-breaker is time when the XP was gained so that the first monk to reach the XP number gets the higher ranking.

This, of course, depends on XP changes being timestamped...

Then there always is asciibetical, or Moe could just write a really popular node and break the tie himself.

Comment on Re: Bug in the saint's board

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Bug in the saint's board by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Aug 01, 2003 at 15:24 UTC
Though, adding the timestamping of XP changes would be useful in adding another featurette - instead of providing the aggregate XP change, saying "You gained 213423 XP and lost 2 XP" (or something of the nature ...) ------ We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age. The idea is a little like C++ templates, except not quite so brain-meltingly complicated. -- TheDamian, Exegesis 6 Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.	[reply]
Re: Bug in the saint's board by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Aug 01, 2003 at 15:09 UTC
Moe could also downvote one of more nodes of the other guy. Or log in his other identity, and upvote his own posts. Abigail	[reply]
Re: Re: Bug in the saint's board by CountZero (Bishop) on Aug 01, 2003 at 15:18 UTC
But of course, a saint being .... well, saintly, would never resort to such tactics. CountZero "If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law	[reply]
Re: Bug in the saint's board by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Aug 01, 2003 at 15:22 UTC
It would just show how silly it is to give someone who hasn't done more than collecting a certain about of xp the title "saint". Abigail	[reply]
Re: Re: Bug in the saint's board by suaveant (Parson) on Aug 01, 2003 at 20:58 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Bug in the saint's board by Anonymous Monk on Aug 01, 2003 at 22:58 UTC


Perl: the Markov chain saw
	PerlMonks