|
in reply to (jeffa) Re: Win32::Lanman
in thread Win32::Lanman
Actually, I had looked at a few reviews, and I didn't see them include source code, so I didn't either. I will edit my post to include some sample source code then. As for the book review, I will take constructive criticism on that if you will post it. I thought it was good, but I'm only trying to be helpful here, so let me know what you'd like to see. |
(jeffa) 3Re: Win32::Lanman
by jeffa (Bishop) on Jul 16, 2003 at 21:38 UTC
|
The best thing to do is sit down and read a lot of
reviews. I was too ambiguous about code ... book
reviews do not need to include code, but i think that
module reviews benefit from good, easy to digest, cohesive
code. There really are no rules for writing reviews for the
Monastery, that's why i recommend that you read a lot of
them and decide for yourself. As a bonus, you will learn
a lot more than you probably ever wanted to know about
Perl. ;) If you would like some recommendations, then check
out ybiC's review of Data Munging and
davorg's review of the mod_perl Cookbook.
Steve_p even managed to get away with a
review on a Java book. :D
And as always, when in doubt, post your review to your
scratch pad and politely ask the monks
hanging around the Chatterbox to critique it.
jeffa
L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L--
-R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR
B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B--
H---H---H---H---H---H---
(the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)
| [reply] |
|
|
Yes, those are excellent suggestions, especially the last. So did it help that I put the code in here? I had hoped it would help. I put a link to the code sample I used, as well as my own code which was done in Visual Perl.NET. Thanks for the Input... I appreciate it.
| [reply] |
Re: Re: (jeffa) Re: Win32::Lanman
by SyN/AcK (Scribe) on Jul 16, 2003 at 17:59 UTC
|
There, that should be better. | [reply] |
|
