No objections and still no actions? Or I am missing something?

Objections aren't what's keeping features from being implemented. Lack of support/enthusiasm by the appropriate people, and lack of code are. Lack of praise of a feature by the powers that be is essentially an objection. As a pmdevil, if I don't support a feature, i'm not gonna be inclined to implement it. Unless somebody champions a feature, it's never gonna happen.

Now, given the availability of xml tickers, you may just want to implement this, like davorg did it once (but he lost the code -update:- and he forgets he ever wrote it;)). I also think blakem may have done it, althought I can't find a link.

update: Turns out blakem crated bivnn.cgi -- an alternate interface to newest nodes (you might also be interested in Perlmonks Threaded Article Viewer).

update: dammit. I continually keep confusing davorg with mirod. For some reason, they are forever linked in my head. And this is like the 3rd time I did this (I even had davorg convinced he wrote this thing -- sorry dude).
See (crazyinsomniac) Re: /msg me for new nodes in a thread I noded in and mirod also said:
mirod says I think it was called the perlmonks threaded interface or something, but it was a CGI thingie, so even if you used it the script was on my machine. I tried using Google but I can't find it I'll try to rewrite it
mirod says no, I have lost everything in the crash (and I feel so dumb for it :--( I could try rewriting it though, I am away from home and I have a little time locked in my hotel room this week

I just acquired the best of Tesla ;)

MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"

I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).

** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.