Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer |
|
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: RFC US Region Moduleby trs80 (Priest) |
on Jul 06, 2003 at 19:19 UTC ( [id://271808]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
If I leave it OO don't I avoid the issue of the function name collision you mention? While I agree there is no current or compelling reason for this module to be OO it does seem to work easily enough to provide the functionality I need. Would I see benefits from it being non-OO?
The DATA read has been moved outside of the new since that was the wrong spot for it and subsequent object creations would have resulted in an empty hash ref being assigned to $self. Of the names I felt the Geography namespace would be best, but I am still struggling with the Census::Regions / Regions::Census issue for these reasons:
Thanks for the feedback.
In Section
Meditations
|
|