note
tall_man
It looks like exponential-order to me. I added some code to sum up the number of permutations of the sets:
<code>
$bigtotal += Math::NumberCruncher::Permutation(scalar(@Num),MATRIX_DIM);
@Sol=CheckSolution(\@Num);
</code>
Here are the results:
<code>
Order 4:
Maximum divisor is 416, solution is 2496-9152-1664-2080
Checked 19301184 cases
1445.940u 5.500s 27:10.91 88.9% 0+0k 0+0io 364pf+0w
Order 3:
Maximum divisor is 44, solution is 132-792-660
Checked 140526 cases
10.690u 0.050s 0:14.69 73.1% 0+0k 0+0io 364pf+0w
Order 2:Maximum divisor is 7, solution is 21-84
Checked 820 cases
0.290u 0.010s 0:00.33 90.9% 0+0k 0+0io 364pf+0w
</code>
At that rate, order 5 will test about 1 billion cases and take over a day to run. But
I think it might be feasible if bad solution sets are eliminated early.
<p>The big problem is the permutations, which are factorial order. I would suggest picking the corner two items first. They have to have the same top digit. Then that determines the possible top digits of the rest of the rows.
267624
267661