Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: passing subroutine args as a hash: why not?

by djantzen (Priest)
on Jun 06, 2003 at 15:33 UTC ( [id://263715]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: passing subroutine args as a hash: why not?
in thread passing subroutine args as a hash: why not?

I can't speak to the usability of HTML::Template, never having worked with it, so I'll take your word for it. However I take strong exception to the idea that inheritance should be avoided. True it is kludgy, as is all of Perl's OO support, but it works predictably and reliably, and the decision to make use of it should depend upon architectural decisions and not discomfort with its implementation. Indeed the only problems I've ever encountered with inheritance have been in modules with constructors that have not been cleanly designed to support it, for example, have used the single argument form of bless. For more see inheritance: constructors.


"The dead do not recognize context" -- Kai, Lexx
  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: passing subroutine args as a hash: why not?

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://263715]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-19 13:07 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found