get the best and fastest answer
|
|
|
|
Clear questions and runnable code get the best and fastest answer |
|
| PerlMonks |
Re: Re: (2) Proportional Reputation (avoid encouraging controversy for it's own sake)by agentv (Friar) |
| on May 02, 2003 at 21:10 UTC ( [id://255165]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
> encouraging controversy for controversy's sake.
...and yet, I have to say that there is a valid distinction between a reputation 12 node that has been voted on a mere 12 times, and one that has garnered 100 votes, with a mild bias in favor of the good. This distinction may be illuminating, but of course we must also keep in mind that we don't see a node's reputation until after we've made a decision about it ourselves.
...All the world looks like -well- all the world,
when your hammer is Perl.
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||