http://qs321.pair.com?node_id=25498


in reply to (Ozymandias) RE: (5) running with scissors - part 2 (Merlyn!=infallible)
in thread "running with scissors"

(I'm not willing to) "accept more foibles from someone simply because they're famous"

Me neither, my friend.   I accept Merlyn's foibles because (up till yesterday anyway) he was willing to point out problems in posted code that other fine, guru-caliber Monks may not have always caught.

Personally, I think we're extremely fortunate that Randal is/was with us.   I say this with tremendous respect for all the great Perl coders here, but I don't see Larry, Tom, Gurusamy, or <insert respected name here> beating down doors to contribute to the Monastery.
    cheers,
    ybiC

  • Comment on RE: (7) running with scissors - part 2 (!=famous, ==contributing)