P is for Practical | |
PerlMonks |
RE: Yet Another Cargo Cult non-use of CGI.pmby BlueLines (Hermit) |
on Aug 01, 2000 at 00:00 UTC ( [id://25327]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
whoops. i don't know what to say. i hereby swear to tatoo CGI.pm on my forehead and to look in the mirror every time i'm tempted to roll my own.
although i guess i don't understand the problem with using code like this if it does the job correctly for me. Not that i doubt the inherent goodness of CGI.pm, but would rewriting old scripts that i use once every 6 months be worth it just for stylistic correctness? I mean, if it's not broke and not mission-critical, is it worth the time?
BlueLines
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|