Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl: the Markov chain saw
 
PerlMonks  

RE: Make Supersearch more obvious

by lindex (Friar)
on Jul 31, 2000 at 12:49 UTC ( [id://25227]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Make Supersearch more obvious

I would like to add one more thing, we should beable to vote more than once on a node.
Considering I did not know about Super Search I find this node very helpfull in it self and should get more than one of my votes :)



lindex
/****************************/ jason@gost.net, wh@ckz.org http://jason.gost.net /*****************************/

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE: Make Supersearch more obvious
by atl (Pilgrim) on Jul 31, 2000 at 14:42 UTC
    On a first glance I'd say yes, it's unfair that I can give a good node and an excellent node only the same vote-up.

    But there might be a problem when it comes to flame threads, and god knows this site has some (I have only the link to this one handy, but there are more). Consider what might be going on if some monks might start a showdown with their votes ...

    No offence meant to anyone!

    It's just that one man one vote is ok, in my own humble opinion.

    Andreas

    P.S.: No objections against kudra's suggestion. I agree.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://25227]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others surveying the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-19 21:41 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found