Bookmarks Section

Dear Monks
I believe that bookmarking would help all of us

Some Observations
1. Perl Programming does not happen in vaccume.
2. We know a good amount of resources collectively which can help us
3. Good amount of outside links exists which we use daily.
Idea:Categorized Bookmarks section on Perlmonks.
Bookmark Operations:
- Add
- Up Vote
- Down Vote
- Move to a different category
- Copy to a different category
- Delete
- Update
- Describe
- Review
Advantages:
- A a good service to the perl community.
- Good and fresh links for given topics.
- Many others.
Related Thoughts:
- Request/Response Links on specific topics. Example:
  - Configuration of Apache on Windows XP with Perl and MYSQL.
  - Configuration of .emacs with CPerl mode.
Notes: Author can get dynamic XP for bookmark suggestion.
Request: Your Feedback and Suggestions.

Comment on Bookmarks Section

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
•Re: Bookmarks Section by merlyn (Sage) on Mar 29, 2003 at 06:15 UTC
It'd make more sense to contribute that URL to the Perl category of the DMOZ, so that it'd show up in Google-rank and on many other websites that extract the DMOZ links. -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.	[reply]
Re: Bookmarks Section by boo_radley (Parson) on Mar 29, 2003 at 21:28 UTC
outside links covers the basics of what you want. There's some that've aged, and died, but it's still a good resource. /msg sitedocclan if you feel like things need to be added or shuffled around the links.	[reply]
Re: Bookmarks Section by feanor_269 (Beadle) on Mar 31, 2003 at 17:31 UTC
Already been written... here's the links for you: first one second one feanor_269	[reply]
Re: Bookmarks Section by Anonymous Monk on Mar 29, 2003 at 10:13 UTC
I don't think so. Reason 1 -- a gazillion solutions already exist. Reason 2 -- who's gonna write it? (pmdev got better things to do) Reason 3 -- it's yet another well thought out suggestion by artist -- sure, it'll happen. Reason 4 -- you're just not convincing anybody.	[reply]