Dear pmdevils and gods,
I thought it might not be a bad idea if we could add moderation to patches. Something like 5 votes and it gets approved.
We could have a patches to consider superdoc, and a patch approval nodelet (or that can be a part of PmDev Nodelet and Patch Lister respectively).
theorbtwo thought it a reasonable idea, but one that would never happen. (btw, he suggests 4 votes to approve, gods get 2 votes, pmdevil's 1)
So what do you guys think?
Sure it might open up the possiblity for pmdevils to do bad things, but 4/5 votes is a lot.Short of simple markup/html changes, I wouldn't approve a node until I tested it (my vow to you -- I got E installed locally and can reasonably test most everything ), and I'm sure other pmdevs would be just as scrutinizing.
PS - I volunteer theorbtwo to implement this if it comes to that , and volunteer to help ;)
______crazyinsomniac_____________________________ Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most. perl -e "$q=$_;map({chr unpack qq;H*;,$_}split(q;;,q*H*));print;$q/$q;" |
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: pmdev: patches to consider (feature idea)
by Chady (Priest) on Mar 12, 2003 at 11:54 UTC | |
by PodMaster (Abbot) on Mar 12, 2003 at 12:21 UTC | |
Re: pmdev: patches to consider (no, thanks)
by tye (Sage) on Mar 12, 2003 at 19:26 UTC | |
Re: pmdev: patches to consider (feature idea)
by JayBonci (Curate) on Mar 12, 2003 at 15:53 UTC | |
by crazyinsomniac (Prior) on Mar 12, 2003 at 16:18 UTC | |
by JayBonci (Curate) on Mar 12, 2003 at 16:33 UTC | |
by tye (Sage) on Mar 12, 2003 at 17:33 UTC |
Back to
Perl Monks Discussion