Exactly. In more detail, what the original regex ends up doing goes like this:
<%start_(.*?)\s*(.*?)\s*%>\n?(.+?)<%end_\1%>\n?
$1- -A- $2- -B- $3- C-
Quickly matches <%start_
Tries $1 matching ""
Tries A matching ""
Tries $2 matching "wibble XXX"
Tries $3 matches to just before "<%end_flub%>"
Is forced to backtrack by C
Tries $3 matches to just before "<%end_wibble%>"
Is forced to backtrack by C
Tries $1 matching "w"
Tries A matching ""
Tries $2 matching "ibble XXX"
Tries $3 matches to just before "<%end_flub%>"
Is forced to backtrack by C
Tries $3 matches to just before "<%end_wibble%>"
Is forced to backtrack by C
Tries $1 matching "wi"
Tries A matching ""
Tries $2 matching "bble XXX"
Tries $3 matches to just before "<%end_flub%>"
Is forced to backtrack by C
Tries $3 matches to just before "<%end_wibble%>"
Is forced to backtrack by C
...
Tries $1 matching "wibble"
Tries A matching " "
Tries $2 matching "XXX"
Tries $3 matching to just before "<%end_flub%>"
Is forced to backtrack by C
Tries $3 matches to just before "<%end_wibble%>"
Succeeds finding one match
which you can see wastes a lot of time.
That is one reason why Death to dot star! suggests you use character class
instead of . whenever possible in a regex.
-
tye