Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

(ar0n) Re: Possible bug in Nodelet Nodelet

by ar0n (Priest)
on Feb 17, 2003 at 19:38 UTC ( #236087=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Possible bug in Nodelet Nodelet

Ah, sorry about that. I had added Nodelet Nodelet to the list of publicly available nodelets to let certain people in the know in on the testing of said nodelet, and had forgotten it was still there. The bug has been fixed, thanks. It was indeed a conflict between various 'sexisgood' buttons.

More nodelet features are forthcoming, so stay tuned.

  • Comment on (ar0n) Re: Possible bug in Nodelet Nodelet

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: (ar0n) Re: Possible bug in Nodelet Nodelet
by hv (Parson) on Feb 17, 2003 at 22:04 UTC

    Thanks. For what it's worth, I was trying it in the hope that it'd do something different: I want to keep the enabled nodelets as brief as possible, so I was hoping the Nodelet Nodelet would either show the selected nodelet in a full page as if it were a node, or show it as a nodelet but temporarily (a one-shot enable) so that I could still find back things like the 'Leftovers' links when I needed them.


Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://236087]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others about the Monastery: (2)
As of 2021-10-16 03:10 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    My first memorable Perl project was:

    Results (69 votes). Check out past polls.