Re: URL Tomfoolery


Syntactic Confectionery Delight
	PerlMonks

Re: URL Tomfoolery

by chromatic (Archbishop)

on Jan 25, 2003 at 09:11 UTC ( [id://229814]=note: print w/replies, xml )

Need Help??

in reply to URL Tomfoolery

That one's been in the code for a long time. I blame nate.

Comment on Re: URL Tomfoolery

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re^2: URL Tomfoolery (sexisgood)
by tye (Sage) on Jan 26, 2003 at 06:50 UTC

No, the new tradition is: I blame ar0n. And I do. He changed some form from POST to GET so sexisgood now shows in the address bar. I like GET for very simple forms exactly because the URL shows in the address bar (and you can reload, and...). I think that this particular side-effect was unintended.

Now even a simple search for "sexisgood" will find something moderately informative (this node).

tye

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion