Re^2: Why isn't ->can() curried?

This is what comes of spending time with other languages. *grin* In this case it's E which has a home page at http://www.erights.org. It had never occured to me that people would want to compare the code references from ->can. When is that useful?

Seeking Green geeks in Minnesota

Comment on Re^2: Why isn't ->can() curried?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re^2: Why isn't ->can() curried? by Anonymous Monk on Jan 20, 2003 at 21:11 UTC
One use is to verify that a subclass has actually implemented an abstract interface.	[reply]
Re^4: Why isn't ->can() curried? by diotalevi (Canon) on Jan 20, 2003 at 21:36 UTC
Ah! And I'd previously thought that wasn't detectable. Son in the guise of one thought you've answered something else I didn't know I was asking about! grin Seeking Green geeks in Minnesota	[reply]


P is for Practical
	PerlMonks