|
|
|
| Syntactic Confectionery Delight | |
| PerlMonks |
Re: Re: This poll has:by arturo (Vicar) |
| on Jan 07, 2003 at 22:22 UTC ( [id://225094]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
Hrm, in dismissing it as a "sophism" you're missing out on a rich field of study. I maintain, on the contrary, that the "Liar Paradox" is as yet to receive a satisfactory treatment that is adequate for natural languages. If not P, what? Q maybe?
In Section
Past Polls
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||