|
|
|
| There's more than one way to do things | |
| PerlMonks |
Re: Re: Re: Re: Handy dandy CPAN pollutionby demerphq (Chancellor) |
| on Dec 30, 2002 at 17:27 UTC ( [id://223093]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
. I like the idea of allowing both OO and non-OO, So do I. The problem is that at a pedantic level the implementation is broken. CGI's more so than OOorNo, but..... Just document the inflexibility of the code, Neither CGI or OOorNo document the weaknesses of their approach. Reading the source is required to figure out what is wrong, and frankly in both cases Id guess that a fair amount of experience is required to spot the weaknesses. IMO part of a computer programmers job is to think about how things can be broken. CGI makes attempts in that direction OOorNo does not. Neither are satisfactory on an abstract level.
--- demerphq
In Section
Meditations
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||