|
|
|
| There's more than one way to do things | |
| PerlMonks |
(nrd) Re: (tye)Re: "Re:" getting out of hand.by newrisedesigns (Curate) |
| on Dec 18, 2002 at 23:05 UTC ( [id://220980]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
|
I agree that this is somewhat trivial. The only benefit from a standardized naming convention is to aid in finding nodes. Not being able to find something on Perl Monks is somewhat rare, although it does happen. As long as the node title is easily searchable, I see no reason to change it. And if it isn't, that node just doesn't get seen as often as it could. John J Reiser
In Section
Perl Monks Discussion
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||