I would help you, except you're obviously spamming.
And spammers suck.
-- Chip Salzenberg, Free-Floating Agent of Chaos | [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
++chip. Damn, you have a keen eye. Called him out, and *then* he lets us know he's trying to spam some old dead bought list. Makes me wonder why he's even trying to "insert spammer word that tipped you off" the list. Why not spam folks multiple times.
Anyway, It's not often I get to hunt people down and downvote them for fun. Thanks for pointing out this opportunity.
-- dug
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
| [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
Perhaps you should try tying your hash, so you won't have to keep it in memory?
-- Dan | [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |
(party line)
Why don't you try adding use strict; and possibly use warnings. Using local variables might significantly decrease your ram usage (then again, it might not) | [reply] [Watch: Dir/Any] |