Problems? Is your data what you think it is? | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: Re: Re: CGI_Lite vs. CGI::Simpleby perrin (Chancellor) |
on Sep 19, 2002 at 20:35 UTC ( [id://199292]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
It's a good idea. Unfortunately, CGI::Cookie requires CGI, which slows the script down massively. CGI::Simple::Cookie is measurably slower than CGI_Lite at this. Remember, compile times are part of it and that may be the only problem for CGI::Simple -- it uses two separate files. I'm currently working on getting fastCGI to run with this setup, because it's absurd to have to think about the number of files being used as a performance problem.
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|