Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Don't ask to ask, just ask
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: Re: CGI_Lite vs. CGI::Simple

by perrin (Chancellor)
on Sep 19, 2002 at 20:35 UTC ( #199292=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: Re: CGI_Lite vs. CGI::Simple
in thread lighter alternative to CGI.pm

It's a good idea. Unfortunately, CGI::Cookie requires CGI, which slows the script down massively. CGI::Simple::Cookie is measurably slower than CGI_Lite at this. Remember, compile times are part of it and that may be the only problem for CGI::Simple -- it uses two separate files.

I'm currently working on getting fastCGI to run with this setup, because it's absurd to have to think about the number of files being used as a performance problem.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: CGI_Lite vs. CGI::Simple

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://199292]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others cooling their heels in the Monastery: (4)
As of 2023-02-08 10:39 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:







    Results (41 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?