Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Keep It Simple, Stupid

Re: Re: Re: CGI_Lite vs. CGI::Simple

by tachyon (Chancellor)
on Sep 19, 2002 at 19:31 UTC ( #199268=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??

in reply to Re: Re: CGI_Lite vs. CGI::Simple
in thread lighter alternative to

If that's all you need why not call CGI::Cookie or CGI::Simple::Cookie directly? You don't need to call CGI/CGI::Simple at all as these modules have their own APIs....

use CGI::Cookie; use Data::Dumper; my %cookies = fetch CGI::Cookie; print "Content-type: text/html\n\n", Dumper \%cookies;




Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: CGI_Lite vs. CGI::Simple
by perrin (Chancellor) on Sep 19, 2002 at 20:35 UTC
    It's a good idea. Unfortunately, CGI::Cookie requires CGI, which slows the script down massively. CGI::Simple::Cookie is measurably slower than CGI_Lite at this. Remember, compile times are part of it and that may be the only problem for CGI::Simple -- it uses two separate files.

    I'm currently working on getting fastCGI to run with this setup, because it's absurd to have to think about the number of files being used as a performance problem.

Log In?

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://199268]
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others romping around the Monastery: (4)
As of 2023-02-02 00:49 GMT
Find Nodes?
    Voting Booth?
    I prefer not to run the latest version of Perl because:

    Results (15 votes). Check out past polls.