Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
good chemistry is complicated,
and a little bit messy -LW
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: IO::Scalar vs IO::String

by joe++ (Friar)
on Sep 13, 2002 at 14:01 UTC ( #197584=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: IO::Scalar vs IO::String
in thread IO::Scalar vs IO::String

Hello hiseldl,

Thanks for the suggestion - but I need this trick inside my own module, and just in one place, so the module itself can be considered the "wrapper" in a way.

My consideration is which module to use right now, just hoping someone who has experience with both of them to give the right suggestion.

This really would be a no-brainer if one of these modules was part of Perl's core distribution (or considered to become part of is for that matter).

Cheers,
Joe

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: IO::Scalar vs IO::String
by hiseldl (Priest) on Sep 13, 2002 at 14:15 UTC
    My recommendation is to use IO::Scalar because it is more mature and from the pod

      Note: as of version 2.x, these classes all work like their IO::Handle counterparts, so we have comparable functionality to IO::String.

    it has similar functionality to IO::String, so using IO::Scalar seems to be a win-win.

    --
    hiseldl
    "Act better than you feel"

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://197584]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this? | Other CB clients
Other Users?
Others examining the Monastery: (4)
As of 2020-09-18 21:22 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?
    If at first I donít succeed, I Ö










    Results (113 votes). Check out past polls.

    Notices?