in reply to lighter alternative to

CGI Lite will probably be the closest replacement (with less headache) to but definately not as robust. If there was anyway possible to move to Apache webserver then by all means perl_mod would probably do the trick.

My two cents are wheat pennies.

Good Day!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: lighter alternative to
by perrin (Chancellor) on Aug 29, 2002 at 20:12 UTC
    Naturally if I had that kind of control, we would be using Apache/mod_perl. However, I don't, so I have to find a solution that fits in the existing system. Thanks for the ++ on CGI_Lite.
Re: Re: lighter alternative to
by diakonos (Hermit) on Aug 29, 2002 at 20:06 UTC
    Geez! I menat to say mod_perl!!! I have to quit thinking that preview is for layout only. Sorry.