Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Just another Perl shrine
 
PerlMonks  

RE: RE: Re: Algorithm Efficiency vs. Specialized Hardware?

by lhoward (Vicar)
on Jun 20, 2000 at 23:34 UTC ( [id://19082]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to RE: Re: Algorithm Efficiency vs. Specialized Hardware?
in thread Algorithm Efficiency vs. Specialized Hardware?

Here's the code I used to run my test:
my @size=(100,1000,10000,100000); foreach(@size){ my $size=$_; print "size=$size\n"; my $now = 8; my %url = ( monday => { @{[map(($_,1), (1..$size))]} } ); timethese(0, { Grep => q{ $now = (sort grep {$_ <= $now} keys %{$url{'monday'} +})[-1]; }, Ternary => q{ $now = ($now < $_ && $_ < 8 ? $_ : $now) for keys + %{$url{'monday'}}; }, Max => q{ foreach ( keys %{$url{'monday'}} ) { $now = $_ if $_ +> $now }; } }); }
I am awful suspicious of my tests taking almost the same amount of time to run no matter how many elements there were in the dataset.

I think I am onto something... I don't think the code posted in teh original question really benchmarks what the user thinks it does... I'm crafing a new reply to the original question that should be up soon.

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://19082]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others goofing around in the Monastery: (3)
As of 2024-04-19 17:51 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found