Foo::Quux is not an option (Text::Control is both non-sensical, and relatively useless. Quux essentially provides for specifying a series of tr transformations in a non-perl, plain-text manner. See "CONTROL FILES".

I am still leaning towards Foo::Bar->new(-Quux), since as I said the Current Foo::Bar is really Foo::Bar->new(-Baz), and simply croak-ing on a new with both -Quux and -Baz.

OT: I pronounce it qu-ucks, like quick ducks without the ick'd. This is in agrrement with The Jargon File, especially given the association with crux.

--
perl -pew "s/\b;([mnst])/'$1/g"

OT: anyone know how to pronounce quux?

I tend to pronounce it "kooks", like the Usenet infestation, but I think "kwooks" is more popular.

--
F o x t r o t U n i f o r m
Found a typo in this node? /msg me
The hell with paco, vote for Erudil!

I pronounce it kwuhks; rhyming with bucks rather than books (or pukes). I think that is generally accepted.

I pronounce "qux" as kuhks and "quuux" as kwew-uks but I think those are both personal variations.

-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";

The Jargon File entry for "quux" claims that it is pronounced /kwuhks/.

-- Mike

--
just,my${.02}