Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Perl-Sensitive Sunglasses
 
PerlMonks  

Re: Re: Re: acronym for perl shell?

by Jenda (Abbot)
on Aug 08, 2002 at 21:29 UTC ( [id://188745]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to Re: Re: acronym for perl shell?
in thread acronym for perl shell?

Just to add to the article info about PSH.pm:

  • Line editing: PSH.pm does not support command line editing per se. I'm using WinNT/Win2k and the Command Prompt window provides all command line editing and history features I need. If anyone likes PSH.pm and wants to extend it to optionaly use Term::ReadLine or something, I'm ready to help.
  • Job Control: Since I'm using (and expecting others to use) PSH.pm usualy for debuging and testing things, then as a real shell I did not consider things like that. Besides ... you have the full power of Perl at your fingertips, you may do whatever you like.
  • Piping: Any line starting with ! is passed to the default shell for processing. With only one speciality, if the line ends with a > then the output of the command will not be printed but stored in variable $it. Therefore if the default shell supports pipes ...

PSH.pm was never expected to be a real shell. It was more influenced by the interactive development interfaces of Prolog or ML.

Jenda

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://188745]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others rifling through the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-04-19 11:16 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found