Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
Think about Loose Coupling
 
PerlMonks  

Re: How node in SOPW is answered? I suggest author's ability to reject bad answers

by mkmcconn (Chaplain)
on Jul 23, 2002 at 20:45 UTC ( [id://184580]=note: print w/replies, xml ) Need Help??


in reply to How node in SOPW is answered? I suggest author's ability to reject bad answers

It's not a bad idea to give the author the ability to indicate satisfaction with the answers given, in the root node. Maybe the author can be provided an "Enlightened" flag, to let readers know that the answer to the question was found in the nodes below.

On the other hand the convention sometimes followed, of posting a node thanking the monks for their help, is sufficient.

But, I do not think that the author should ever be given censorship or sanction powers over his answerers, except for his vote and his freedom to express his opinions like any other monk in the monastery.
mkmcconn

Log In?
Username:
Password:

What's my password?
Create A New User
Domain Nodelet?
Node Status?
node history
Node Type: note [id://184580]
help
Chatterbox?
and the web crawler heard nothing...

How do I use this?Last hourOther CB clients
Other Users?
Others having a coffee break in the Monastery: (6)
As of 2024-03-28 09:55 GMT
Sections?
Information?
Find Nodes?
Leftovers?
    Voting Booth?

    No recent polls found