P is for Practical | |
PerlMonks |
Re: DBI specification changeby bronto (Priest) |
on Jul 16, 2002 at 14:14 UTC ( [id://182087]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Don't you think that, since this change is going to break existing code significantly, it should deserve a major change in version numbering also? Personally, when I upgrade from version n.m to version n.m+1 I expect that nothing differs but bug fixes or minor changes. And, a fortiori, that my programs that ran on n.m will still run flawlessly on n.m+1. I think that many people will fall in the trap of upgrading and finding their (production?) code broken; it is not fair1 Ciao! Note: breaking other's code is not fair, but upgrading without reading release notes is unsafe: I agree!
In Section
Meditations
|
|