"be consistent" | |
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: Negative Look-behind Assertionby december (Pilgrim) |
on Jul 15, 2002 at 22:12 UTC ( [id://181942]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
I know about look-behind assertions, but I was wondering if there would be a way to do it wihtout... it looks like a common, simple thing, _not_ matching a word... But if look-behind assertions are the only solution, then I'll use them. I'm not interested in the other solutions, since they require a code change, and... well, it's a bit working around the problem that I wanted to know. Thanks!
In Section
Seekers of Perl Wisdom
|
|