good chemistry is complicated, and a little bit messy -LW |
|
PerlMonks |
Re: Re: Re^3: Initiative or otherwise?by dws (Chancellor) |
on Jul 08, 2002 at 22:41 UTC ( [id://180342]=note: print w/replies, xml ) | Need Help?? |
Programmer B's method of development was cut and paste, followed by light editing. People who routinely develop this way are generally not very good.
The task is to prepare a demo. To infer from that what Programmer B's "routine" development strategy is requires assumptions based on facts not in evidence. It also eliminates the common element of starting with someone else's work and presenting the result as your own. Where do you see any indication that Programmer B misrepresented his/her work?
In Section
Meditations
|
|