in reply to (Warning) If you use AS then wait for 633
Let me say that again, I don't believe you.
Furthermore, let me add on that, I don't believe you.
Honestly demerphq, I don't believe you. It won't update correctly is not very descriptive. I've got 632 and have been using it fine for days now. I haven't tried updating ppm3, so i'm not sure if i've tested for whatever serious bug which reportedly exists.
I beg of you, please clarify.
UPDATE (Wed Jun 26 09:25:21 2002) :
It's been a while and I installed about 20 packages since, and i've come to the conclusion that PPM3, the version you speak of, sucks donkey balls. I still haven't seen the bug you describe, but searching has become a pain in the ass. Whereas before, searching for File::Cache, yielded results, this time round, you should either search for File or Cache or File-Cache. Whoever messes around with ppm really screwed up big time. I say stick to ppm (ie ppm2x) until this business gets sourted out, cause as it stands, it's not worth the trouble.
______crazyinsomniac_____________________________ Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most. perl -e "$q=$_;map({chr unpack qq;H*;,$_}split(q;;,q*H*));print;$q/$q;" |
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: (Warning) If you use AS then wait for 633
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Jun 20, 2002 at 09:37 UTC | |
by osfameron (Hermit) on Jun 20, 2002 at 09:51 UTC |